Privacy Curtain Changing and Cleaning Policies

Curtains_wmicrobes_final_10.17.11We’re just back from the Association for Professionals in Infection Control (APIC) conference in Ft. Lauderdale, and we read with interest a poster called Hospital Privacy Curtains: Cleaning and Changing Policies – Are We Doing Enough? presented there. Spoiler alert: the answer is no.

The investigators surveyed 49 infection control professionals in six states about privacy curtain management in standard patient rooms and ambulatory care rooms. They found that:

  • 96% use privacy curtains in patient rooms
  • 55% had a written policy on the frequency of cleaning privacy curtains
  • 53% had a written policy on the frequency of changing privacy curtains
  • 37% clean privacy curtains in a standard hospital room ‘only when visibly soiled’
  • 13% clean privacy curtains in a standard hospital room ‘every month’
  • 13% clean privacy curtains in a standard hospital room ‘every 3 months’
  • 13% clean privacy curtains in a standard hospital room ‘once per year’
  • 39% responded ‘Other’ to the question of how frequently they clean privacy curtains
  • Curtains were most often changed or cleaned when a patient had been discharged from an isolation room for a multi-drug resistant organism
  • 82% of respondents felt that hospital curtains are a potential source of transmission of healthcare associated infections
  • 86% felt that management of hospital curtains could be improved

We’re not surprised at these results. They are yet one more confirmation that the issue of soft surface contamination is not being sufficiently addressed. We hope some APIC attendees and other infection control professionals will view the poster and make some of the improvements in how privacy curtains are handled. We look forward to better results in future surveys.

 

PurThreadTM Technologies Inc. is dedicated to developing proprietary antimicrobial textile technology. Our patent-pending, integration technology and fiber formulations incorporate an EPA-registered antimicrobial additive into every fiber and yarn to protect the fabric from degradation. Learn more about our antimicrobial textile technology.

PurThread also makes a range of freshness products for other markets such as the military, emergency first responders and performance athletic wear in which our next-generation technology and fiber formulations expand the high performance options available to protect fabrics from odor, mold and mildew causing bacteria.

Healthcare Acquired Infection: Finding Silent Clostridium difficile Carriers

Easy TargetClostridium difficile (C. diff) is a serious healthcare acquired infection often carried by those who don’t present any symptoms.

Universal screening is costly, invasive, and controversial. Thus, identifying likely carriers early is highly desirable.

Similarly, identifying patients at risk of developing an infection can aid in monitoring and diagnosis. Two recent studies indicate the potential for efficient screening and improved infection control by identifying risk factors.

Researchers from the Mayo Clinic studied asymptomatic adults admitted to a tertiary care hospital over a two month period, sampled them for C. diff infections. The study, published in the American Journal of Infection Control, described how the team identified three independent risk factors that were present in 48 percent of their study participants:

  • Recent hospitalization
  • Chronic dialysis
  • Corticosteroid use.

The researchers found that screening only those patients with one of those risk factors would identify 74 percent of the C.diff carriers. The hope is that more efficient screening of carriers at admission can reduce overall incidents of infection.

The journal BMC Medicine contains a study by University of Michigan Medical School researchers that found that adults who suffer from major depression have a 36 percent increased risk of developing a Clostridium difficile infection. Patients who take Remeron® or Prozac®, two common antidepressants, are twice as likely to develop a C. difficile infection.

Most other types of antidepressants did not affect risk of infection. The authors cautioned that patients should not stop taking antidepressants unless they are advised to do so by their physician.

The same study found that widowed adults had a 54 percent higher likelihood of infection than married peers, which the authors posited may have some connection to depression. More research is needed to determine whether the increased risk is caused by intestinal changes during depression or by the medications.

 

PurThreadTM Technologies Inc. is dedicated to developing proprietary antimicrobial textile technology. Our patent-pending, integration technology and fiber formulations incorporate an EPA-registered antimicrobial additive into every fiber and yarn to protect the fabric from degradation. Learn more about our antimicrobial textile technology.

PurThread also makes a range of freshness products for other markets such as the military, emergency first responders and performance athletic wear in which our next-generation technology and fiber formulations expand the high performance options available to protect fabrics from odor, mold and mildew causing bacteria.

 

Infection control efforts undone by dirty needles?

iStock_000012926478Small needleInfection control is a complex endeavor. As we’ve mentioned in this column many times before, successful healthcare-associated infection control requires a multifaceted approach: hand hygiene, environmental services, antimicrobial hard and soft surfaces, basic best surgical and instrument-handling practices and more. That’s why it’s so surprising to most Americans that reusing syringes or drawing multiple doses from single-use vials of medications in healthcare settings is still a problem.

Granted, it’s only a small percentage of injections that violate CDC injection safety protocols, but it’s somewhat shocking that it happens at all. Approximately 150,000 people1 have been affected by inappropriate injection practices over the past decade. However, the impact on some of the affected patients and facilities can be dramatic, including outbreaks of MRSA, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C.

A survey reported in the American Journal of Infection Control, found that 6% of clinical personnel questioned said they “sometimes or always” use single-dose/single-use vials for more than one patient. Other less frequently cited practices that are inconsistent with current guidelines included overt syringe reuse and use of a bottle or bag of IV solution for more than one patient. All reported infractions, by the way, occurred about evenly in hospital and non-hospital settings—outpatient cancer clinics, hemodialysis clinics, dental offices, pain clinics, and so on.

The survey concluded that a multifaceted approach would be needed to reduce or eliminate unsafe injection practices. Use of educational resources from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and others, redesign of devices to reduce the risks of unsafe practices, surveillance and monitoring, and enforcement of those protocols and laws. In addition, the study recommends developing a culture where patients, supervisors, and peers are vigilant to make sure safe practices are followed and vocal in questioning health care providers to make sure injections are safe.

1 Dirty medical needles put tens of thousands at risk in USA USA Today, March 6, 2013

 

 

PurThreadTM Technologies Inc. is dedicated to developing proprietary antimicrobial textile technology. Our patent-pending, integration technology and fiber formulations incorporate an EPA-registered antimicrobial additive into every fiber and yarn to protect the fabric from degradation. Learn more about our antimicrobial textile technology.

PurThread also makes a range of freshness products for other markets such as the military, emergency first responders and performance athletic wear in which our next-generation technology and fiber formulations expand the high performance options available to protect fabrics from odor, mold and mildew causing bacteria.

Is that C. diff you sniff? Good dog!

Implementing a canine-based monitoring system for early detection could help control the spread of the infection.It’s no secret that the canine sense of smell is much more sensitive than our own. Now researchers in the Netherlands have shown how that sensitivity can be applied to identification and diagnosis of Clostridium difficile with remarkable accuracy. More importantly, implementing a canine-based monitoring system for early detection could help control the spread of the infection.

The research paper in the British Medical Journal, Using a dog’s superior olfactory sensitivity to identify Clostridium difficile in stools and patients: proof of principle study, describes how a 2-year-old beagle was trained to differentiate known C. diff-infected stool samples from controls. Further, the researchers trained the dog to sit or lie down when C. diff was detected.

The dog’s accuracy was very impressive: sensitivity and specificity were both 100% using samples in the lab. On detection rounds, he correctly identified 25 of the 30 known cases, and 265 of the 270 controls. The paper estimates that most cases of C. diff take 2-7 days to diagnose and start treatment, and suggest that a regular program of canine detection rounds could lead to earlier detection and treatment.

Looking forward to seeing how else you can help, Dr. Dawg.

Hand Hygiene Compliance as Part of a Multifaceted Approach to Infection Control

What are the top 10 ways to spread germs?Why do we so frequently use the term “multifaceted approach” when we talk about what’s required to address the problem of healthcare associated infections (HAIs)? Here’s one reason: hand hygiene is widely acknowledged as an essential element of any HAI control program, and hand hygiene compliance rates vary widely among medical personnel, let alone hospital visitors.

The Resources section of this site includes some basic information about hand hygiene. In addition, we provide links to two other comprehensive programs to help healthcare facilities improve their hand hygiene compliance rates. The advice in those programs fall into five categories:

  • Training and education – making sure all personnel, including new hires, understand the proper protocols
  • System change/infrastructure – supplies and systems to make compliance easy
  • Workplace reminders – basically strategically placed signage
  • Monitoring and feedback – praise for compliance, accountability for non-compliance
  • Institutional culture – patient safety, and especially hand hygiene, should be a priority, and everyone should know it.

World Health Organization (WHO) Multimodal Hand Hygiene Improvement Strategy

Society of Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA)  How-to Guide: Improving Hand Hygiene – A Guide for Improving Practices among Health Care Workers

Scrubs and Uniforms: Are Garments Spreading Infections?

Several studies have found that scrubs, uniforms, even healthcare workers’ ties can harbor harmful bacteria. While studies have yet to conclusively prove the role of such garments in actually spreading infection, common sense about the likelihood has led many healthcare facilities to institute relevant precautions. Those precautions include things like encouraging healthcare workers to change to civilian clothes before leaving the facility and providing either in-house or contracted third-party laundering of scrubs and uniforms.

If scrubs are carrying harmful bacteria, then at least the perception, if not the reality, that uniforms are spreading infection would make it inadvisable to wear scrubs outside the facility, especially in sandwich shops and produce markets. Even with the best staff intentions, home laundering water temperatures are sometimes inadequate to eliminate resistant bacteria. The heat of ironing would help, but compliance with simply washing uniforms is uneven at best.

A quick review of a few studies explains why some institutions are taking the conservative approach despite the absence of conclusive evidence:

  • One study found that bioburden found on scrubs laundered at home prior to use was greater than those laundered at the healthcare facility or a third-party healthcare laundry after the latter had been worn for a day in the operating room.
  • Another study found potentially dangerous bacteria on more than 50 percent of doctors’ and nurses’ uniforms tested.
  • Half of the ties worn by doctors and medical students were found to harbor several pathogens, compared to only 10 percent of the ties of security guards at the same facility.

Best Practices for Reducing Bioburden in Long Term Care Facilities

Long-term care facilities have some unique characteristics that require special attention above and beyond standard hospital-grade infection control protocols.Long-term care facilities have some unique characteristics that require special attention above and beyond standard hospital-grade infection control protocols. We can consider the appropriate prevention and control actions in the context of common infection transmission routes:

  • Direct contact — Physical contact with an infected person.
  • Indirect contact — From a contaminated object or person (uniforms, gowns, and other clothing; shared activity equipment is a common source).
  • Droplet — From an infected person’s respiratory tract during coughing, sneezing or talking. Zone of risk can be up to six feet.
  • Airborne — Small particles remain suspended in air and can be inhaled by susceptible people.
  • Environmental — Via construction dust, insects, pests and similar environmental sources.

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) issues detailed infection control guidelines for long-term care facilities.
Here is a quick overview of precautions and considerations in those facilities. Some apply to only one of the infection transmission methods; others work against multiple transmission mechanisms.

Hand Hygiene
  • Use an alcohol-based hand rub when hands are not visibly soiled, after contact with objects near a resident, and after removing gloves and other personal protective equipment (PPE).
  • Wash hands with an antimicrobial soap and water when hands are visibly dirty or contaminated.
  • Follow CDC guidelines for hand hygiene.
Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
  • Gloves—disposable (latex or nitrile) medical examination gloves for direct care; reusable utility gloves for environmental or equipment cleaning.
  • Use mask, gown, face shield, and/or eye protection during patient care activities that may cause splashes or sprays.
  • Remove and dispose of PPE before leaving the resident’s room.
Respiratory Hygiene
  • Cover your mouth and nose with a tissue whenever you cough and promptly dispose of used tissues.
  • Perform hand hygiene after contact with respiratory secretions.
  • Offer masks to coughing residents, staff, or visitors and encourage them to maintain approximately three feet (one meter) distance from others. If zone is six feet, wouldn’t that be a better recommendation?
Equipment and Devices
  • Each facility should have a strategy for dealing with single-use medical devices and equipment.
  • A central area should be allocated for cleaning, disinfecting and/or sterilizing equipment and devices for use.
  • Written policies and staff training on treatment of devices and equipment are essential.
  • Cleaning and disinfecting processes should be consistently monitored to ensure quality and compliance.
Employee Personal Hygiene 
  • Daily showers or baths.
  • Clean, neatly trimmed, unpolished nails, no false nails.
  • Clean uniform every day. Change when leaving the facility.
Signage In the interest of preventing the spread of infection, it’s hard to post too many reminders. Respect for the resident’s privacy is an important concern as well. Signs should remind residents, visitors, and staff about:

  • hand hygiene,
  • maintaining safe distances,
  • disinfecting care equipment or dedicating it to a single resident
  • using PPE, and
  • checking with the nursing station before entering the room
Environmental Services
  • Cleaning and disinfecting should be continuously performed.
  • Clear standards for cleaning and disinfecting should be defined and it should be similarly clear who is accountable for compliance.
  • Continuing education of cleaning staff is essential.
  • Cleaning practices should be routinely monitored and audited.
Pets and Service Animals
  • Service animals, pets, pet therapy animals can harbor and pass germs or parasites to humans, or spread animal diseases to humans.
  • Follow all the same precautions after contact with pets as after contact with humans.
  • Maintain regular veterinary care.
  • Make sure the animal’s diet uses uncontaminated food and water.
  • Provide flea and tick control.
Linen
  • Use clean linen cart covers to protect clean linen from contamination.
  • If clean linen comes in contact with any contaminated object, it should be rewashed.
  • Keep clean linen carts separated from soiled linen carts or hampers.
  • Handle soiled linen carefully, using gloves to handle contaminated linens.
  • Never shake out dirty linen as it may cause germs or bacteria to become airborne.

Happy Birthday to Hand Hygiene’s Dad?

Just before we celebrate the birthday of the U.S., we should stop and think about the 194th anniversary of the birth of Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis.

Born in Hungary on July 1, 1818, Dr, Semmelweis was an assistant in the obstetrics unit of a Vienna hospital when he noticed that women whose babies were delivered by doctors and medical students had a much higher post-delivery mortality rate (13-18%) than women whose deliveries were performed by midwives or midwife trainees (2%).

He hypothesized that the differences were due to doctors and medical students handling corpses before performing deliveries, thus exposing the women to cadaveric material that led to puerperal (childbed) fever.

Dr. Semmelweis, father of hand hygiene

Dr. Semmelweis, father of hand hygiene

Despite the fact that his theory contradicted the miasmatic (bad or polluted air) theory of disease that was the prevailing wisdom of the day, Dr. Semmelweis conducted a controlled trial where physicians and students washed their hands with a chloride of lime solution before touching their maternity patients. The resulting 2% mortality rate (equivalent to that of the midwives) proved his point.

He later reduced the mortality rate even further (to 1%) by washing the medical instruments. Thus, he has been known as the “father of hand hygiene” and the “savior of mothers.”

What he offered in medical insight, he unfortunately lacked in change management skills. His understanding of germ theory 20 years before it was acknowledged was prescient, but he was never able to overcome the popular theories and resistance to change.

His handwashing protocols and improvements to healthcare were not implemented until long after his death, when Pasteur and Lister proved germ theory and the value of those protocols.

(Now that I’ve conveyed this story, I’m going to stop typing and go wash my hands. Thanks, Dr. Semmelweis!!)